I recently visited India as part of a drive to increase corporate users to our site.
Two headlines caught my attention on my arrival. The first, “The Government lowered the full year economic growth forecast to 7.3% from 9% as industrial slowdown hit India’s GDP in the second quarter (July to September).” The second headline was a huge debate about whether the Government should open up the country to foreign direct investment in the multi-brand retail sector – not 100% foreign ownership, but to allow large, foreign multi-brand retailers, such as Walmart, to operate joint ventures in the country. The Government wants to proceed, but there is huge opposition from those who say that India’s huge army of small traders will be decimated.
Looking at this from a European perspective, what nice problems to have! Growth of 7.3% is an impossible dream for any country in Europe – an “if only” that would solve the public debt problem. In India, such low growth is a cause for concern.
India has only recently become a global growth powerhouse. It always had the potential, of course, but it was not until the ‘liberalisation’ of the economy, which started in 1991, that the shackles began to be removed from Indian business. Indians make excellent businessmen if given the opportunity. The results are clearly shown and recognised in the kind of GDP growth that has now been sustained for many years.
What India has achieved in the past 20 years illustrates how a Government can influence and direct growth. Most Indian businesses would say, though, is that it’s not enough, and there is still so much more to do. The FDI issue in retail is one example. Having large multi brand retailers is inevitable. Bringing in the expertise of leading foreign players will help transform the Indian supply chain and distribution system. It would also shake up and help modernise the still backward agricultural industry in the country.
Another problem for business is caused by India’s incredibly stringent labour laws, which hugely discourage the hiring of permanent employees. The laws are so protective of workers that they blunt hiring and stifle growth. They cover virtually every aspect of employment: how workers are hired; what they get paid; the hours they work, and whether they can be fired. India has more restrictive labour laws than even European countries – which says it all. For a country that needs to continue rapid growth to satisfy the aspirations of a growing population, this is a real problem, and something the Government could easily solve if it had the political will to do so.
The fix that is used by businesses is to hire contract workers via special agencies, which is how 24.3% of all workers are currently being employed, according to the Indian Labour Bureau. This way, employers avoid shouldering the onerous responsibility of having permanent staff. It also explains why 89% of companies in India employ fewer than 10 staff, as opposed to 11% in the U.S. and 4% in China.
There remains a long way to go before Indian business reaches its full power to create economic growth. In one way, disappointing, yet in another way, encouraging, as the necessary changes will undoubtedly come – in time.